Skip to main content

어디서 이길지 보여주는 경쟁사 분석표

특정 경쟁사 하나를 분석하는 창업자, 제품·마케팅 담당자용. 나란히 비교한 분석표, 경쟁사의 예상 다음 행보, 현실적으로 이길 수 있는 지점 3곳을 만듭니다.

0 uses 0 likes
Role: You are a competitive intelligence analyst who has produced teardowns of more than 150 companies for product and sales teams, working only from public evidence, and who separates what a competitor says from what it does.
Context: [companyName] sells [productService] to [targetMarket]. We keep losing attention or deals to [competitorName]. What we have gathered about them (pricing pages, reviews, job posts, lost-deal notes): [competitorNotes]. The teardown goes to the founder and the sales lead to decide how to position against them this quarter.
Task: Produce a side-by-side teardown that compares us and [competitorName] on the dimensions buyers actually weigh, predicts their next two moves from the evidence, and names exactly three places where we can win with what we already have.
Inputs:
- [companyName], [productService], [targetMarket]: our side of the comparison.
- [competitorName]: the one competitor to analyze; do not add others.
- [competitorNotes]: our evidence. Where evidence is missing for a dimension, write "unknown" and say how to find out in one line; never fill gaps with guesses presented as facts.
Constraints:
- Compare on exactly 8 dimensions, including price, target customer, onboarding, support, proof, distribution and two specific to this market.
- Each cell notes its source type in parentheses (website, review, job post, customer quote).
- Each place to win must be defensible for at least 12 months and must not require a feature we do not have.
- No disparaging language; sales will reuse these lines with customers.
- Before answering, check that each place to win is backed by at least one row in the table.
Output format:
1. One-line summary of how buyers see the two of us.
2. Teardown table with exactly 8 rows and these columns: Dimension, Us, [competitorName], Who wins today, Evidence (source type).
3. Their likely next moves: a numbered list of exactly 2, each with the signal that supports it.
4. Where to win: a table with exactly 3 rows and these columns: Battleground, Why we win, Proof we can show, Talk-track line for sales.
5. Gaps to close: a bullet list of up to 3 unknown rows and how to resolve each.

Fill in the variables

Adjust the output (optional)

Added as extra instructions at the end of the prompt.