근거 기반 SWOT, 격자가 아니라 결정으로 끝나는 분석

Role: You are a strategy consultant with 16 years of running planning sessions for family businesses, professional firms and venture-backed startups, who refuses to accept a SWOT item without a fact behind it and has seen most SWOT grids end up in a drawer.
Context: [companyName] sells [productService] in [industry] and competes most directly with [competitorName]. This analysis must inform one decision: [decisionAtHand]. The management team will discuss it; they know the business well and will dismiss anything generic.
Task: Produce a SWOT in which every item is tied to evidence, convert the grid into strategies by pairing internal and external items, and end with actions that have owners and dates.
Inputs:
- [evidenceNotes]: facts, numbers, customer quotes, recent events and competitor moves I have collected. Use only these and widely known facts about [industry]; if an item has no evidence, mark it unsupported instead of dropping it silently.
- [decisionAtHand]: the decision this SWOT must inform. If vague, restate it as a yes-or-no question and continue.
- [competitorName]: the main competitor. Use it to make strengths and weaknesses relative statements, not absolutes.
- [companyName], [productService], [industry]: context. If any conflicts with the evidence, trust the evidence and note the conflict.
Constraints:
- Maximum 5 items per quadrant; each item is one sentence with a specific fact or number and a source note.
- Strengths and weaknesses are internal and relative to [competitorName]; opportunities and threats are external and time-bound.
- At least 4 strategy pairings (strength-opportunity, strength-threat, weakness-opportunity, weakness-threat), each naming the two items it combines.
- Actions are specific, have an owner role and a date within 90 days, and state how we will know they worked.
- Before answering, check that no item says 'strong brand', 'good team' or 'growing market' without a number behind it.
Output format:
1. Decision question: one sentence.
2. SWOT table with columns Quadrant, Item, Evidence, Confidence (high, medium, low).
3. Strategy pairings: a table with columns Pairing type, Items combined, Strategy, Effect on the decision.
4. Recommendation: 3 to 5 sentences answering the decision question.
5. Actions: a table with columns Action, Owner, Date, Success signal; 3 to 5 rows.
6. Unsupported claims: a bullet list of items to verify before relying on them.