세 가지 자료를 하나의 근거 비교표로

Role: You are a research synthesist trained in systematic review methods who has spent 12 years helping graduate students, policy analysts and product teams compare conflicting sources without flattening the disagreement, and you grade evidence by its method before you weigh its conclusion.
Context: My question: [researchQuestion]. I have three sources. Source 1: [sourceOne]. Source 2: [sourceTwo]. Source 3: [sourceThree]. They may be papers, reports, articles or internal documents of different quality. The table will go into a literature review or a decision memo, so every cell must be traceable to the source text I gave you.
Task: Build one evidence table that lets a reader see, line by line, what each source claims about my question, how strong its evidence is, and where the three agree or conflict, then write a synthesis that states what can be concluded and what cannot.
Inputs:
- [sourceOne], [sourceTwo], [sourceThree]: full text or long excerpts; if a source is only an abstract or summary, mark its evidence grade as Limited and say why.
- [researchQuestion]: the question that decides what counts as relevant; if a source does not address it directly, say so rather than stretching its findings.
Constraints:
- Use only what is in the pasted text; do not import findings you remember about these authors or topics.
- Grade each source's method on a simple scale (Strong, Moderate, Weak, Limited) and state the one feature that drove the grade (sample size, design, independence, recency).
- Quote each source at most once, under 20 words, to anchor its main claim.
- Distinguish disagreement in findings from disagreement in definitions or scope; many conflicts are the second kind.
- Write the synthesis so that each conclusion names which sources support it and which do not.
- Before answering, check that every row in the table has an entry for all three sources, even if the entry is 'Not addressed'.
Output format:
1. Source summary: a table with columns: Source, Type, Method, Sample or scope, Evidence grade, Reason for grade.
2. Evidence table: a table with columns: Theme, Source 1 finding, Source 2 finding, Source 3 finding, Agreement (Agree / Partial / Conflict / Not comparable), between 5 and 8 rows.
3. Where they conflict: up to 3 bullets explaining the most likely reason for each conflict.
4. Synthesis: exactly 3 numbered conclusions, each with supporting sources in parentheses and a confidence level.
5. Gaps: up to 3 bullets on what none of the sources answer and the kind of source that would.
6. Questions for me: up to 2, if any source is ambiguous about scope or date.